Skip to main content

How function overriding is different in C# from Java?

If you are moving from Java to C#, than this is one thing which you would find very funny.

Suppose you wrote the following code:

class a
{
   public void display() 
   {
     Console.WriteLine("A");
   }
}

class b:a
{
   new public void display()
   {
    Console.WriteLine("B");
   } 
}

And did something like:

A a = new B();
a.display();

B b = new B();
b.display();

The output would be:
A
B

Although we expect here that as we have overriden display in B, so the display of B must be called. But this assumption is incorrect as we have reserved reference for A, so the C# compiler won't know that B can override display function. Hence we need to tell the compiler that there is a possibility that display can be overriden in derived classes and please check for it. To do so we would have to define the baseclass function which can be overriden as virtual and than use override keyword in all the derived classes. So that compiler can create a function pointer map or whatever it creates and point correct function pointer for various derived types.

This is done in the following way:


class a
{
   virtual public void display() 
   {
     Console.WriteLine("A");
   }
}

class b:a
{
   override public void display()
   {
    Console.WriteLine("B");
   } 
}

And did something like:

A a = new B();
a.display();

B b = new B();
b.display();

The output would be:
B
B

I hope this helps a few java developer to understand c#.
So, what i figured out from this is C# gives us a slight more flexibility for overriding a function with new but I am not yet sure will i like to use it? And if yes, a very good usecase for it.


Popular posts from this blog

Why India Hasn’t Built Its GPT Moment (Yet)

India has the world’s third-largest startup ecosystem, a thriving developer base, and a mobile-first population larger than the US and Europe combined. Yet, no GPT-4. No DeepMind. No Amazon-style platform. Why? Innovation Isn’t Accidental—It’s Engineered The Zerodha Daily Brief recently asked why India hasn’t built a global product company like Apple. The key argument: India isn’t building for the world. It’s solving for local constraints, scale, and affordability—but global scale requires deep IP, design, and tech differentiation. It’s not just about software, it’s about systems thinking. More importantly, it answers the question: Why do countries innovate? The answer isn’t just genius or ambition—it’s incentives and ecosystems. The U.S. Defense Department, for example, accounted for nearly 70% of federal R&D funding during the Cold War. China has pumped billions into semiconductors and AI with long-term national alignment. These aren’t short-term bets—they are strategic, delibe...

Problems with mysql.sock

Sometimes while working on Linux, mysql.sock may get deleted by mistake due to some softwares.. in such cases any access to mysql wont be possible as the sock file defines the socket connection for mysql. It will give an error of the following type: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2) In such cases follow these steps to reconfigure mysql: Delete the log files with the names: ib_logfile0, ib_logfile1 and ibdata1 in the /var/lib/mysql directory Then type: "mysqld_safe --user=mysql &" This will automatically create mysql.sock file and even the new logs files. This is a very simple solution which I used recently and decided to share with you people.

Universal Xp serial key

The key given below is the universal serial key for Windows Xp.. It can by pass any windows xp cd and make your copy genuine. Do try it!!! V2C47-MK7JD-3R89F-D2KXW-VPK3J